EMSC vs. EMEM

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

EMSC (Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF) and EMEM (Sophus Capital Emerging Market ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Sophus Capital. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMSC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for EMEM.

Performance

EMSC vs. EMEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF (EMSC) and Sophus Capital Emerging Market ETF (EMEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EMSC

• 1D: -2.99%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMEM

• 1D: -3.34%
• 1M: 1.75%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMSC vs. EMEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EMSC Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF	-0.03%
EMEM Sophus Capital Emerging Market ETF	1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between EMSC and EMEM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2026	0.89

Return for Risk

EMSC vs. EMEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF (EMSC) and Sophus Capital Emerging Market ETF (EMEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

EMSC vs. EMEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMSC drawdown since its inception was -7.52%, smaller than the maximum EMEM drawdown of -8.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSC and EMEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMSC	EMEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-8.12%	+0.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.09%	-6.79%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.36%	-3.06%	-0.30%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMSC	EMEM	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.99%	38.40%	-4.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.99%	38.40%	-4.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.99%	38.40%	-4.41%

EMSC vs. EMEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMSC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EMEM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMSC vs. EMEM - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMSC nor EMEM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMSC and EMEM in my portfolio?

EMSC and EMEM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMSC or EMEM?

On fees, EMEM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMSC or EMEM?

EMEM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for EMSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMSC or EMEM?

EMSC and EMEM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EMSC and EMEM?

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for EMSC and 0.65% for EMEM.