EMSC vs. ECOW
EMSC (Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF) and ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. EMSC is actively managed, while ECOW is passively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EMSC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ECOW.
Performance
EMSC vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EMSC
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ECOW
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 25.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $621.23K | $703.11K | $1.41M | |
| $589.48K | $425.09K | $1.71M |
EMSC vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EMSC Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF | -3.72% |
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | -1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMSC and ECOW is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMSC vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank
EMSC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ECOW
EMSC vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF (EMSC) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMSC | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMSC vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMSC drawdown since its inception was -10.93%, smaller than the maximum ECOW drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSC and ECOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMSC | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.93% | -40.27% | +29.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.52% | -4.43% | -6.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -10.95% | +6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.13% | — |
Volatility
EMSC vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMSC | ECOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.50% | 14.84% | +15.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 17.74% | +12.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.50% | 20.05% | +10.45% |
EMSC vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMSC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMSC vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison
EMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ECOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.48% | 5.20% | 7.35% | 5.46% | 7.50% | 4.39% | 3.35% | 8.08% |
EMSC Sophus Capital Emerging Market Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMSC and ECOW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ECOW is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ECOW is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for EMSC.
ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 0.00% for EMSC.
They also come from different issuers: Sophus Capital and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for EMSC and 0.70% for ECOW.
Find the right allocation for EMSC and ECOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer