PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMQQ vs. TDEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMQQ vs. TDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -19.80% return, which is significantly lower than TDEC's 9.14% return.


EMQQ

1D
-2.68%
1M
-5.01%
YTD
-19.80%
6M
-21.08%
1Y
-15.68%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
-11.29%
10Y*
4.58%

TDEC

1D
-0.33%
1M
1.54%
YTD
9.14%
6M
11.08%
1Y
24.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMQQ vs. TDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
-19.80%20.66%-2.53%
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
9.14%21.39%-0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQQ and TDEC is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2024

0.79

The correlation between EMQQ and TDEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMQQ vs. TDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQQ
EMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

TDEC
TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQQ vs. TDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMQQTDECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.54

-0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

2.97

-3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

13.07

-14.11

EMQQ vs. TDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the TDEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQQ and TDEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMQQTDECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.76

2.41

-3.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

1.81

-1.71

Drawdowns

EMQQ vs. TDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than TDEC's maximum drawdown of -10.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and TDEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMQQTDECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.24%

-10.30%

-62.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.96%

-8.16%

-21.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.75%

-0.33%

-57.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.36%

-1.04%

-30.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.04%

1.85%

+13.19%

Volatility

EMQQ vs. TDEC - Volatility Comparison

EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) at 2.81%. This indicates that EMQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMQQTDECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.04%

2.81%

+4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.37%

9.02%

+7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.59%

10.09%

+10.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.12%

11.75%

+21.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.61%

11.75%

+18.86%

EMQQ vs. TDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than TDEC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMQQ vs. TDEC - Dividend Comparison

EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, while TDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
3.85%3.09%1.70%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.18%1.29%0.00%0.94%0.75%0.08%
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMQQ and TDEC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMQQ has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to TDEC (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs TDEC's -10.30%.

On 1-year performance, TDEC leads with 24.15% vs -15.68% for EMQQ. On fees, EMQQ is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, TDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TDEC has performed better with a 24.15% return vs -15.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMQQ is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.

EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 0.00% for TDEC.

EMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TDEC is Defined Outcome. EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while TDEC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.95% for TDEC.

TDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMQQ and TDEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer