EMQQ.DE vs. ESGP.DE
EMQQ.DE (HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF) and ESGP.DE (Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMQQ.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce, while ESGP.DE is a Gold fund tracking the VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMQQ.DE returned 3.65%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for ESGP.DE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMQQ.DE charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ESGP.DE.
Performance
EMQQ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ.DE achieves a -12.93% return, which is significantly lower than ESGP.DE's 11.48% return.
EMQQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 8.35%
- 6M
- -14.86%
- YTD
- -12.93%
- 1Y
- -12.67%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- -9.10%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- YTD
- 11.48%
- 1Y
- 16.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ.DE HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF | -12.93% | 5.41% | 20.12% | 1.14% | -23.94% | -17.59% |
ESGP.DE Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF | 11.48% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.10% | -2.36% | 2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ.DE and ESGP.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.58 |
The correlation between EMQQ.DE and ESGP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ.DE vs. ESGP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ.DE
ESGP.DE
EMQQ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE) and Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMQQ.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.25 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 2.65 | -3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 7.50 | -8.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMQQ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.92%, which is greater than ESGP.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ.DE and ESGP.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.92% | -20.50% | -47.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.36% | -6.31% | -25.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.36% | -20.50% | -10.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.99% | 0.00% | -53.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.81% | -5.23% | -31.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.95% | 2.23% | +15.72% |
Volatility
EMQQ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) at 2.13%. This indicates that EMQQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ.DE | ESGP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 2.13% | +4.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 8.96% | +6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.41% | 11.59% | +8.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.00% | 14.44% | +16.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 14.44% | +16.70% |
EMQQ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ.DE has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGP.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ.DE vs. ESGP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMQQ.DE nor ESGP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ.DE and ESGP.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESGP.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGP.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.DE.
EMQQ.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while ESGP.DE is Gold. EMQQ.DE tracks EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce, while ESGP.DE tracks VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ.DE and 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ.DE and ESGP.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer