PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMQP.L vs. EMQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMQP.L vs. EMQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQP.L) and EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMQP.L is traded in GBp, while EMQQ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMQQ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMQP.L having a -18.87% return and EMQQ.L slightly higher at -18.66%.


EMQP.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
-18.87%
6M
-21.11%
1Y
-16.31%
3Y*
2.39%
5Y*
-10.64%
10Y*

EMQQ.L

1D
-2.72%
1M
-3.53%
YTD
-18.66%
6M
-21.19%
1Y
-16.25%
3Y*
2.22%
5Y*
-10.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMQP.L vs. EMQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMQP.L
EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating
-18.87%10.86%14.87%-1.35%-23.12%-32.47%76.70%26.84%-6.17%
EMQQ.L
EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating
-18.66%10.43%15.09%-0.82%-23.62%-32.30%77.42%25.26%-5.13%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQP.L and EMQQ.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2018

0.91

The correlation between EMQP.L and EMQQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMQP.L vs. EMQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMQP.L
EMQQ.L

Consumer Cyclical

52.5%
51.9%

Communication Services

20.6%
20.2%

Financial Services

18.1%
19.4%

Technology

7.0%
6.7%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.9%

Healthcare

0.9%
0.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

EMQP.L
52.5%
EMQQ.L
51.9%

Communication Services

EMQP.L
20.6%
EMQQ.L
20.2%

Financial Services

EMQP.L
18.1%
EMQQ.L
19.4%

Technology

EMQP.L
7.0%
EMQQ.L
6.7%

Real Estate

EMQP.L
1.0%
EMQQ.L
0.9%

Healthcare

EMQP.L
0.9%
EMQQ.L
0.9%

Basic Materials

EMQP.L

-

EMQQ.L

-

Consumer Defensive

EMQP.L

-

EMQQ.L

-

Energy

EMQP.L

-

EMQQ.L

-

Industrials

EMQP.L

-

EMQQ.L

-

Utilities

EMQP.L

-

EMQQ.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMQP.L vs. EMQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQP.L
EMQP.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EMQP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

EMQQ.L
EMQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
EMQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQP.L vs. EMQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQP.L) and EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMQP.LEMQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.89

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

-0.51

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

-0.98

-0.10

EMQP.L vs. EMQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQP.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is comparable to the EMQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQP.L and EMQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMQP.LEMQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.85

-0.74

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

-0.34

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.04

+0.01

Drawdowns

EMQP.L vs. EMQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQP.L drawdown since its inception was -67.77%, roughly equal to the maximum EMQQ.L drawdown of -67.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQP.L and EMQQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMQP.LEMQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.77%

-67.75%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.10%

-29.25%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.10%

-29.25%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.96%

-58.86%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.14%

-57.09%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.31%

-35.76%

-2.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.13%

15.17%

-0.04%

Volatility

EMQP.L vs. EMQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQP.L) and EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQQ.L) have volatilities of 6.93% and 7.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMQP.LEMQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

7.11%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.12%

16.00%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.14%

20.06%

-0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.35%

31.41%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.11%

31.29%

+0.82%

EMQP.L vs. EMQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMQP.L and EMQQ.L have an expense ratio of 0.86%.


Dividends

EMQP.L vs. EMQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMQP.L nor EMQQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, EMQP.L and EMQQ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.86% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMQP.L and EMQQ.L have the same expense ratio: 0.86% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMQP.L and EMQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer