Correlation
The correlation between EMQP.L and PGJ is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
EMQP.L vs. PGJ
Compare and contrast key facts about EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQP.L) and Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ).
EMQP.L and PGJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMQP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Nov 5, 2021. PGJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Halter USX China Index. It was launched on Dec 9, 2004. Both EMQP.L and PGJ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMQP.L or PGJ.
Performance
EMQP.L vs. PGJ - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
EMQP.L:
0.32
PGJ:
0.39
EMQP.L:
0.58
PGJ:
0.63
EMQP.L:
1.07
PGJ:
1.08
EMQP.L:
0.12
PGJ:
0.12
EMQP.L:
0.99
PGJ:
0.67
EMQP.L:
7.07%
PGJ:
13.31%
EMQP.L:
23.29%
PGJ:
38.07%
EMQP.L:
-67.77%
PGJ:
-78.37%
EMQP.L:
-48.80%
PGJ:
-64.02%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EMQP.L having a 7.44% return and PGJ slightly lower at 7.25%.
EMQP.L
7.44%
5.04%
1.87%
8.87%
10.78%
-1.39%
N/A
PGJ
7.25%
3.32%
11.08%
15.00%
8.05%
-5.57%
-0.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMQP.L vs. PGJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQP.L has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than PGJ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMQP.L vs. PGJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EMQP.L
PGJ
EMQP.L vs. PGJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQP.L) and Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
EMQP.L vs. PGJ - Dividend Comparison
EMQP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PGJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQP.L EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGJ Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF | 4.65% | 4.70% | 2.50% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 2.05% | 1.94% | 0.37% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
EMQP.L vs. PGJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQP.L drawdown since its inception was -67.77%, smaller than the maximum PGJ drawdown of -78.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQP.L and PGJ.
Loading data...
Volatility
EMQP.L vs. PGJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQP.L) is 6.47%, while Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF (PGJ) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that EMQP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...