EMQP.L vs. KROG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQP.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L).
EMQP.L and KROG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMQP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Nov 5, 2021. KROG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Feb 15, 2022. Both EMQP.L and KROG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EMQP.L vs. KROG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMQP.L vs. KROG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQP.L EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating | -17.67% | 10.86% | 14.87% | -1.35% | -18.06% |
KROG.L Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 14.77% | 0.36% | -6.89% | -26.89% | -14.07% |
Different Trading Currencies
EMQP.L is traded in GBp, while KROG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the KROG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQP.L achieves a -17.67% return, which is significantly lower than KROG.L's 14.77% return.
EMQP.L
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -6.44%
- YTD
- -17.67%
- 6M
- -26.32%
- 1Y
- -15.36%
- 3Y*
- -0.59%
- 5Y*
- -11.88%
- 10Y*
- —
KROG.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 14.77%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- 12.33%
- 3Y*
- -7.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMQP.L vs. KROG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQP.L has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than KROG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMQP.L vs. KROG.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMQP.L
KROG.L
EMQP.L vs. KROG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQP.L) and Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMQP.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | 0.72 | -1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | 1.12 | -2.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.14 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 1.60 | -2.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 3.47 | -4.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMQP.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.74 | 0.72 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | -0.47 | +0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQP.L and KROG.L is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EMQP.L vs. KROG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMQP.L nor KROG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EMQP.L vs. KROG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQP.L drawdown since its inception was -67.77%, which is greater than KROG.L's maximum drawdown of -51.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQP.L and KROG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQP.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.77% | -51.38% | -16.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.88% | -9.85% | -19.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.50% | -38.96% | -17.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.88% | -34.20% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.81% | 3.79% | +7.02% |
Volatility
EMQP.L vs. KROG.L - Volatility Comparison
EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) at 5.79%. This indicates that EMQP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMQP.L | KROG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 5.79% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.11% | 11.74% | +2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.58% | 17.21% | +3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.46% | 19.56% | +11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.29% | 19.56% | +12.73% |