EMPG vs. SHAZ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EMPG (Empro Group Inc) and SHAZ (SharonAI Holdings Inc) are both stocks. EMPG operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare), while SHAZ operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past year, EMPG returned 509.12% vs 43633.33% for SHAZ. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EMPG vs. SHAZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Empro Group Inc (EMPG) and SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EMPG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 509.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SHAZ

• 1D: -7.12%
• 1M: -14.45%
• 6M: 3,445.95%
• YTD: 3,445.95%
• 1Y: 43,633.33%
• 3Y*: 83.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMPG vs. SHAZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMPG Empro Group Inc	0.00%	307.51%
SHAZ SharonAI Holdings Inc	3,445.95%	1,651.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EMPG and SHAZ is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025	0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap EMPG : $143.05M SHAZ : $642.32M

Return for Risk

EMPG vs. SHAZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMPG

EMPG Risk / Return Rank: 100
EMPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
EMPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EMPG Omega Ratio Rank: 100
EMPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
EMPG Martin Ratio Rank: 100

SHAZ

SHAZ Risk / Return Rank: 100
SHAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMPG vs. SHAZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Empro Group Inc (EMPG) and SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMPG	SHAZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	8.23	41.34	-33.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	8.37	35.53	-27.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.72	7.45	-3.74
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	31.99	1,603.01	-1,571.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	164.57	3,864.69	-3,700.12

EMPG vs. SHAZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMPG Sharpe Ratio is 8.23, which is lower than the SHAZ Sharpe Ratio of 41.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMPG and SHAZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMPG vs. SHAZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMPG drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, smaller than the maximum SHAZ drawdown of -99.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMPG and SHAZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMPG	SHAZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.01%	-99.78%	+62.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.05%	-44.73%	+28.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-99.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-29.23%	+26.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-35.39%	+31.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	17.84%	-14.73%

Volatility

EMPG vs. SHAZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Empro Group Inc (EMPG) is 0.00%, while SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ) has a volatility of 36.84%. This indicates that EMPG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHAZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMPG	SHAZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	36.84%	-36.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.00%	294.30%	-294.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.48%	1,734.43%	-1,671.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.33%	1,798.84%	-1,732.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.33%	1,798.84%	-1,732.51%

Dividends

EMPG vs. SHAZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMPG nor SHAZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMPG and SHAZ in my portfolio?

EMPG and SHAZ have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMPG or SHAZ?

SHAZ has higher volatility (36.84%) compared to EMPG (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMPG dropped -37.01% vs SHAZ's -99.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHAZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (41.34 vs 8.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.