PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMP vs. TYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMP vs. TYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Entergy Mississippi, Inc. (EMP) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMP vs. TYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMP
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
-0.93%-1.70%5.50%14.88%-19.74%-5.72%5.31%20.72%-11.69%23.51%
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund
25.59%8.46%60.18%-0.37%24.20%46.86%-70.31%1.79%-24.74%3.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMP achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than TYG's 25.59% return.


EMP

1D
-1.45%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
-4.43%
1Y
3.35%
3Y*
0.92%
5Y*
-1.32%
10Y*

TYG

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.04%
YTD
25.59%
6M
22.94%
1Y
29.72%
3Y*
31.98%
5Y*
25.76%
10Y*
2.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMP vs. TYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMP
EMP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMP Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMP Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

TYG
TYG Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMP vs. TYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Entergy Mississippi, Inc. (EMP) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMPTYGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.36

1.33

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

1.78

-1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.28

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

1.56

-1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.80

6.61

-5.81

EMP vs. TYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMP Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the TYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMP and TYG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMPTYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

1.33

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

1.09

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.11

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between EMP and TYG is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EMP vs. TYG - Dividend Comparison

EMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than TYG's 9.89% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMP
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
4.51%5.96%5.53%5.53%0.00%0.00%3.43%1.17%0.00%3.65%1.71%0.00%
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund
9.89%11.25%7.96%9.87%8.94%5.27%10.85%14.61%13.17%9.01%8.54%13.95%

Drawdowns

EMP vs. TYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMP drawdown since its inception was -24.70%, smaller than the maximum TYG drawdown of -95.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMP and TYG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMPTYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.70%

-95.34%

+70.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-18.76%

+11.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

-25.08%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.12%

-28.36%

+17.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-29.40%

+21.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

4.42%

-1.24%

Volatility

EMP vs. TYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Entergy Mississippi, Inc. (EMP) is 2.84%, while Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) has a volatility of 7.81%. This indicates that EMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMPTYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

7.81%

-4.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.60%

13.83%

-8.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.44%

22.42%

-12.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.48%

23.76%

-11.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.21%

51.23%

-38.02%