PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMOP vs. EVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMOP vs. EVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMOP achieves a 26.99% return, which is significantly lower than EVLU's 29.12% return.


EMOP

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.70%
YTD
26.99%
6M
27.87%
1Y
43.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EVLU

1D
0.11%
1M
3.22%
YTD
29.12%
6M
29.73%
1Y
55.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMOP vs. EVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EMOP and EVLU is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025

0.89

The correlation between EMOP and EVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMOP vs. EVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMOP
EMOP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EVLU
EVLU Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMOP vs. EVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMOPEVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.50

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

4.33

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.49

15.09

-2.60

EMOP vs. EVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the EVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMOP and EVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMOP vs. EVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMOP drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, smaller than the maximum EVLU drawdown of -17.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMOP and EVLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMOPEVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-17.17%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-12.90%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-5.83%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-3.53%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

3.69%

-0.23%

Volatility

EMOP vs. EVLU - Volatility Comparison

AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) has a higher volatility of 10.75% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) at 9.29%. This indicates that EMOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMOPEVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.75%

9.29%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.59%

17.62%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.65%

20.17%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

20.34%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.53%

20.34%

+1.19%

EMOP vs. EVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMOP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EVLU's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMOP vs. EVLU - Dividend Comparison

EMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than EVLU's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
EMOP
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF
0.85%0.27%0.00%
EVLU
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF
3.77%5.20%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMOP and EVLU have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMOP has higher volatility (10.75%) compared to EVLU (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMOP dropped -12.88% vs EVLU's -17.17%.

On 1-year performance, EVLU leads with 55.54% vs 43.07% for EMOP. On fees, EVLU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EVLU has been the lower-risk option at 9.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVLU has performed better with a 55.54% return vs 43.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVLU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for EMOP.

EVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 0.85% for EMOP.

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for EMOP and 0.35% for EVLU.

EVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMOP and EVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer