EMOP vs. EGPT

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and EGPT (VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. EMOP is actively managed, while EGPT is passively managed. EMOP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for EGPT.

Performance

EMOP vs. EGPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EMOP

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -1.96%
• 6M: 20.55%
• YTD: 26.93%
• 1Y: 44.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EGPT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMOP vs. EGPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	26.93%	16.48%
EGPT VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%

EMOP vs. EGPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMOP	EGPT
Technology	45.9%	8.0%
Financial Services	15.4%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	3.5%
Energy	7.9%	1.1%
Industrials	6.0%	6.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	10.0%
Healthcare	3.5%	2.0%
Communication Services	3.0%	4.2%
Utilities	2.8%	-
Real Estate	2.4%	30.5%
Basic Materials	2.3%	23.4%

Return for Risk

EMOP vs. EGPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMOP

EMOP Risk / Return Rank: 78
EMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 80
EMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
EMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 80

EGPT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMOP vs. EGPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) and VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF (EGPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMOP	EGPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.30	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EMOP	EGPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.99%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.12%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMOP	EGPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.23%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.00%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.66%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.66%	—	—

EMOP vs. EGPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMOP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than EGPT's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMOP vs. EGPT - Dividend Comparison

EMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, while EGPT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EGPT VanEck Vectors Egypt Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.15%	6.02%	1.32%	2.45%	2.50%	2.09%	1.72%	0.77%	1.60%	1.59%
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	1.17%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, EMOP or EGPT?

On fees, EMOP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMOP or EGPT?

EMOP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for EGPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMOP or EGPT?

EMOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.00% for EGPT.

What is the main difference between EMOP and EGPT?

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for EMOP and 0.98% for EGPT.