EMNJ.DE vs. QUEJ.DE
EMNJ.DE (iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and QUEJ.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Japan Equities funds - EMNJ.DE tracks the MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index while QUEJ.DE tracks the MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMNJ.DE returned 16.68%/yr vs 7.56%/yr for QUEJ.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMNJ.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QUEJ.DE.
Performance
EMNJ.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMNJ.DE achieves a 19.97% return, which is significantly higher than QUEJ.DE's 17.23% return.
EMNJ.DE
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 13.73%
- YTD
- 19.97%
- 1Y
- 39.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- —
QUEJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- YTD
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 7.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMNJ.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNJ.DE iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 19.97% | 12.87% | 10.79% | 16.08% | -9.80% |
QUEJ.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 17.23% | 3.79% | 1.15% | 8.13% | -12.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMNJ.DE and QUEJ.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | 0.92 |
The correlation between EMNJ.DE and QUEJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMNJ.DE vs. QUEJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMNJ.DE
QUEJ.DE
EMNJ.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMNJ.DE | QUEJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 2.63 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | 7.97 | +4.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMNJ.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMNJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, which is greater than QUEJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNJ.DE and QUEJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMNJ.DE | QUEJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.10% | -15.02% | -13.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -10.45% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -13.94% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.74% | 0.00% | -2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -6.20% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 3.44% | -0.25% |
Volatility
EMNJ.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) at 5.08%. This indicates that EMNJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUEJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMNJ.DE | QUEJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 5.08% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.64% | 14.07% | +2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 17.94% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 15.39% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 15.39% | +2.87% |
EMNJ.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMNJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QUEJ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMNJ.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
EMNJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while QUEJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNJ.DE iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.42% | 1.58% | 1.80% | 1.75% | 2.16% | 1.66% | 1.63% | 1.72% |
QUEJ.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMNJ.DE and QUEJ.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMNJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMNJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QUEJ.DE.
EMNJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while QUEJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMNJ.DE and 0.25% for QUEJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMNJ.DE and QUEJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer