EMNJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE
EMNJ.DE (iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and IBCG.DE (iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Japan Equities funds from iShares - EMNJ.DE tracks the MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index while IBCG.DE tracks the MSCI Japan Index (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMNJ.DE returned 9.72%/yr vs 19.66%/yr for IBCG.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMNJ.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for IBCG.DE.
Performance
EMNJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMNJ.DE having a 19.97% return and IBCG.DE slightly higher at 20.30%.
EMNJ.DE
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 13.73%
- YTD
- 19.97%
- 1Y
- 39.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 9.72%
- 10Y*
- —
IBCG.DE
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- YTD
- 20.30%
- 1Y
- 49.05%
- 3Y*
- 26.62%
- 5Y*
- 19.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
EMNJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNJ.DE iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 19.97% | 12.87% | 10.79% | 16.08% | -13.34% | 9.71% | 5.81% | 3.88% |
IBCG.DE iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) | 20.30% | 26.94% | 22.76% | 32.85% | -5.89% | 12.06% | 7.58% | 9.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMNJ.DE and IBCG.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between EMNJ.DE and IBCG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (5 years) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMNJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMNJ.DE
IBCG.DE
EMNJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMNJ.DE | IBCG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.43 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 4.91 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | 16.44 | -3.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMNJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMNJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.10%, smaller than the maximum IBCG.DE drawdown of -34.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNJ.DE and IBCG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMNJ.DE | IBCG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.10% | -34.79% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.70% | -9.94% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -21.63% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.91% | -21.63% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.74% | -3.52% | +0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -8.31% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 2.97% | +0.22% |
Volatility
EMNJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EMNJ.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBCG.DE) have volatilities of 6.67% and 6.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMNJ.DE | IBCG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 6.82% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.64% | 16.24% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 20.47% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 18.64% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 18.39% | -0.13% |
EMNJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMNJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCG.DE's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMNJ.DE vs. IBCG.DE - Dividend Comparison
EMNJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while IBCG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMNJ.DE iShares MSCI Japan CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.42% | 1.58% | 1.80% | 1.75% | 2.16% | 1.66% | 1.63% | 1.72% |
IBCG.DE iShares MSCI Japan EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, EMNJ.DE and IBCG.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EMNJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMNJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IBCG.DE.
EMNJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Enhanced Focus CTB Index, while IBCG.DE tracks MSCI Japan Index (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMNJ.DE and 0.64% for IBCG.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMNJ.DE and IBCG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer