EMMF vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMMF (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EMMF is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMMF returned 24.00%/yr vs 60.95%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMMF charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.

Performance

EMMF vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMMF achieves a 28.01% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -4.13% return.

EMMF

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 11.20%
• YTD: 28.01%
• 6M: 29.54%
• 1Y: 49.05%
• 3Y*: 24.00%
• 5Y*: 10.81%
• 10Y*: —

GDMN

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -4.13%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 76.93%
• 3Y*: 60.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMMF vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund	28.01%	21.22%	9.45%	20.59%	-13.47%	0.61%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-4.13%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between EMMF and GDMN is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021	0.39

EMMF vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMMF	GDMN
Technology	32.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	14.0%	-
Financial Services	8.2%	-
Communication Services	6.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	-
Industrials	3.8%	-
Energy	2.1%	-
Utilities	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.9%	100.0%
Healthcare	0.3%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

EMMF vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMMF

EMMF Risk / Return Rank: 87
EMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
EMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 89
EMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 34
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMMF vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMMF	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.98	1.26	+1.71
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.90	1.68	+2.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.25	+0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.64	1.98	+2.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.15	4.68	+14.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMMF vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMMF and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMMF	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.98	1.26	+1.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.80	-0.26

Drawdowns

EMMF vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMMF drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMMF and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMMF	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.57%	-52.82%	+20.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.62%	-39.03%	+28.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.02%	-39.03%	+23.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	-37.06%	+35.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.45%	-18.89%	+11.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	16.51%	-13.94%

Volatility

EMMF vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) is 7.23%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 17.94%. This indicates that EMMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMMF	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.23%	17.94%	-10.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.46%	51.79%	-37.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.57%	61.32%	-44.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	47.59%	-33.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.62%	47.59%	-30.97%

EMMF vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMMF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMMF vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

EMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than GDMN's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund	1.85%	2.45%	1.30%	1.62%	3.48%	2.64%	1.93%	2.93%	0.66%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	2.82%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMMF and GDMN in my portfolio?

EMMF and GDMN have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMMF or GDMN?

GDMN has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to EMMF (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMMF dropped -32.57% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

Which ETF is better, EMMF or GDMN?

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 60.95% vs 24.00% for EMMF. On fees, GDMN is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EMMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMMF or GDMN?

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 60.95% return vs 24.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMMF or GDMN?

GDMN is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EMMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMMF or GDMN?

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.85% for EMMF.

What is the main difference between EMMF and GDMN?

EMMF is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EMMF and 0.45% for GDMN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.