EMMF vs. EWH
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH).
EMMF and EWH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMMF is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Aug 10, 2018. EWH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Hong Kong Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996.
Performance
EMMF vs. EWH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMMF vs. EWH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 5.23% | 21.22% | 9.45% | 20.59% | -13.47% | 5.97% | 9.25% | 2.30% | -6.64% |
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 8.66% | 34.50% | 0.00% | -13.87% | -6.81% | -3.49% | 4.17% | 10.74% | -5.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMMF achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than EWH's 8.66% return.
EMMF
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- —
EWH
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- 8.66%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 39.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 5.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMMF vs. EWH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMMF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than EWH's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMMF vs. EWH — Risk / Return Rank
EMMF
EWH
EMMF vs. EWH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMMF | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.66 | 2.09 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 2.66 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.66 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.52 | 11.06 | -0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMMF | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.09 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.04 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.18 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMMF and EWH is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EMMF vs. EWH - Dividend Comparison
EMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than EWH's 4.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 2.25% | 2.45% | 1.30% | 1.62% | 3.48% | 2.64% | 1.93% | 2.93% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWH iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | 4.78% | 5.20% | 4.17% | 4.28% | 2.91% | 2.78% | 2.56% | 2.71% | 2.93% | 4.35% | 3.08% | 2.63% |
Drawdowns
EMMF vs. EWH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMMF drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, smaller than the maximum EWH drawdown of -66.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMMF and EWH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMMF | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.57% | -66.44% | +33.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.62% | -14.56% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.20% | -42.71% | +17.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.68% | -4.63% | -3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -19.58% | +12.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 3.49% | -0.88% |
Volatility
EMMF vs. EWH - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF (EWH) at 6.30%. This indicates that EMMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMMF | EWH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.11% | 6.30% | +2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 12.53% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.91% | 18.77% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.01% | 19.97% | -5.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 19.55% | -3.10% |