EMLP vs. SPMO
EMLP (First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMLP is a MLPs fund actively managed by First Trust, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. EMLP is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMLP returned 10.37%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMLP charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
EMLP vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMLP achieves a 15.76% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLP has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 10.37%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.86% annualized return.
EMLP
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 15.76%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 19.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 44.90%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
EMLP vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 15.76% | 9.67% | 33.39% | 8.05% | 10.39% | 23.20% | -13.36% | 23.40% | -8.70% | 1.07% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLP and SPMO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EMLP and SPMO has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EMLP vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMLP
SPMO
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
EMLP
SPMO
Utilities
EMLP
SPMO
Industrials
EMLP
SPMO
Basic Materials
EMLP
SPMO
Communication Services
EMLP
-
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
EMLP
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
EMLP
-
SPMO
Financial Services
EMLP
-
SPMO
Healthcare
EMLP
-
SPMO
Real Estate
EMLP
-
SPMO
Technology
EMLP
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMLP vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
EMLP
SPMO
EMLP vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMLP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.41 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 3.44 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.36 | 13.01 | -0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMLP vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLP drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLP and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMLP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.61% | -30.95% | -12.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.94% | -12.70% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.47% | -20.13% | +8.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.59% | -22.74% | +8.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.61% | -30.95% | -12.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -1.68% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -4.60% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 3.35% | -1.74% |
Volatility
EMLP vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) is 3.79%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that EMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMLP | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 10.29% | -6.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 16.73% | -8.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.87% | 19.48% | -9.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 19.65% | -5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 20.48% | -2.79% |
EMLP vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMLP has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMLP vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
EMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than SPMO's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.92% | 3.15% | 3.29% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.71% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 4.63% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMLP and SPMO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to EMLP (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMLP dropped -43.61% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.86% vs 10.37% for EMLP. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, EMLP has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.
EMLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.67% for SPMO.
EMLP is categorized as MLPs, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for EMLP and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMLP and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer