EMLP vs. LVHI
EMLP (First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMLP is a MLPs fund actively managed by First Trust, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. EMLP is actively managed, while LVHI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMLP returned 15.13%/yr vs 15.97%/yr for LVHI. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMLP charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
EMLP vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMLP achieves a 15.76% return, which is significantly higher than LVHI's 13.78% return.
EMLP
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 15.76%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 19.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 32.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- —
EMLP vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 15.76% | 9.67% | 33.39% | 8.05% | 10.39% | 23.20% | -13.36% | 23.40% | -8.70% | 1.07% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.78% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLP and LVHI is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.48 |
The correlation between EMLP and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EMLP vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMLP
LVHI
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
EMLP
LVHI
Utilities
EMLP
LVHI
Industrials
EMLP
LVHI
Basic Materials
EMLP
LVHI
Communication Services
EMLP
-
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
EMLP
-
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
EMLP
-
LVHI
Financial Services
EMLP
-
LVHI
Healthcare
EMLP
-
LVHI
Real Estate
EMLP
-
LVHI
Technology
EMLP
-
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMLP vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
EMLP
LVHI
EMLP vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMLP | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.63 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 5.23 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.36 | 21.61 | -9.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMLP vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLP drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLP and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMLP | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.61% | -32.31% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.94% | -6.08% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.47% | -11.99% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.59% | -11.99% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | 0.00% | -2.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.75% | -3.51% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 1.48% | +0.13% |
Volatility
EMLP vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.78%. This indicates that EMLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMLP | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 2.78% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 7.72% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.87% | 9.60% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 11.08% | +3.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 13.75% | +3.94% |
EMLP vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMLP has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMLP vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
EMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than LVHI's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.92% | 3.15% | 3.29% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.71% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 4.63% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.69% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMLP and LVHI have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMLP has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to LVHI (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMLP dropped -43.61% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.97% vs 15.13% for EMLP. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 15.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 2.76% for EMLP.
EMLP is categorized as MLPs, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for EMLP and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMLP and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer