PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMLP vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMLP vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMLP achieves a 15.76% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 8.17% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLP has underperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 10.37%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.


EMLP

1D
0.79%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
15.76%
6M
15.73%
1Y
19.70%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
15.13%
10Y*
10.37%

IDMO

1D
1.36%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
8.17%
6M
10.09%
1Y
24.72%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMLP vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
15.76%9.67%33.39%8.05%10.39%23.20%-13.36%23.40%-8.70%1.07%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
8.17%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EMLP and IDMO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2012

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between EMLP and IDMO has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EMLP vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMLP
IDMO

Energy

48.1%
1.9%

Utilities

47.4%
8.4%

Industrials

3.9%
22.6%

Basic Materials

0.6%
10.2%

Communication Services

-

2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.5%

Financial Services

-

42.4%

Healthcare

-

1.2%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Technology

-

5.3%

Energy

EMLP
48.1%
IDMO
1.9%

Utilities

EMLP
47.4%
IDMO
8.4%

Industrials

EMLP
3.9%
IDMO
22.6%

Basic Materials

EMLP
0.6%
IDMO
10.2%

Communication Services

EMLP

-

IDMO
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EMLP

-

IDMO
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

EMLP

-

IDMO
2.5%

Financial Services

EMLP

-

IDMO
42.4%

Healthcare

EMLP

-

IDMO
1.2%

Real Estate

EMLP

-

IDMO
2.0%

Technology

EMLP

-

IDMO
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMLP vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMLP
EMLP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMLP vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMLPIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.24

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

1.89

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.36

7.64

+4.72

EMLP vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMLP Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMLP and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMLP vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMLP drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLP and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMLPIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.61%

-39.38%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.94%

-12.31%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.47%

-12.65%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.59%

-27.07%

+12.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.61%

-31.34%

-12.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-1.92%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-9.74%

+3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

3.04%

-1.43%

Volatility

EMLP vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) is 3.79%, while Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that EMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMLPIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

7.92%

-4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

16.02%

-8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.87%

17.92%

-8.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

18.03%

-3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

18.18%

-0.49%

EMLP vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMLP has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMLP vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

EMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than IDMO's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
2.76%3.18%3.19%3.92%3.15%3.29%4.70%3.71%4.71%3.80%3.62%4.63%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.52%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMLP and IDMO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to EMLP (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMLP dropped -43.61% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.64% vs 10.37% for EMLP. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EMLP has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.76% for EMLP.

EMLP is categorized as MLPs, while IDMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for EMLP and 0.25% for IDMO.

EMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMLP and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer