EMLP vs. EMO
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO).
EMLP is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Jun 21, 2012. EMO is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 10, 2011.
Performance
EMLP vs. EMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMLP vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 16.08% | 9.67% | 33.39% | 8.05% | 10.39% | 23.20% | -13.36% | 23.40% | -8.70% | 1.07% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 20.88% | 7.38% | 44.45% | 31.76% | 40.13% | 74.70% | -64.47% | 19.60% | -25.73% | 0.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMLP achieves a 16.08% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 20.88% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLP has outperformed EMO with an annualized return of 11.51%, while EMO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.
EMLP
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 16.08%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 20.09%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
EMO
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 20.88%
- 6M
- 23.15%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 34.99%
- 5Y*
- 33.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMLP vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMLP has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMLP vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank
EMLP
EMO
EMLP vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMLP | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 0.91 | +0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 1.28 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.20 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 1.07 | +0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | 3.23 | +5.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMLP | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 0.91 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.23 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.12 | +0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLP and EMO is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EMLP vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison
EMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than EMO's 8.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 2.75% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.92% | 3.15% | 3.29% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.71% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 4.63% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 8.11% | 9.41% | 7.16% | 6.79% | 6.71% | 6.71% | 15.82% | 10.94% | 16.39% | 10.85% | 9.76% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
EMLP vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLP drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLP and EMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMLP | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.61% | -95.06% | +51.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | -18.81% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.59% | -28.59% | +14.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.61% | -93.02% | +49.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -2.55% | +1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -32.27% | +26.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 6.22% | -3.81% |
Volatility
EMLP vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) is 2.80%, while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that EMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMLP | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 4.63% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.79% | 11.12% | -4.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 21.39% | -7.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 26.78% | -12.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 41.41% | -23.69% |