PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMLP vs. AMTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMLP vs. AMTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EMLP

1D
-0.07%
1M
-3.08%
YTD
14.62%
6M
13.20%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
21.22%
5Y*
15.47%
10Y*
10.24%

AMTR

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMLP vs. AMTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
14.62%9.67%33.39%8.05%10.39%23.20%5.16%
AMTR
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN
0.00%0.00%44.68%12.75%20.41%36.99%15.24%

Correlation

The correlation between EMLP and AMTR is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2020

0.74

The correlation between EMLP and AMTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMLP vs. AMTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMLP
AMTR

Energy

48.1%
0.0%

Utilities

47.4%
0.0%

Industrials

3.9%
0.0%

Basic Materials

0.6%
0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Technology

-

0.0%

Energy

EMLP
48.1%
AMTR
0.0%

Utilities

EMLP
47.4%
AMTR
0.0%

Industrials

EMLP
3.9%
AMTR
0.0%

Basic Materials

EMLP
0.6%
AMTR
0.0%

Communication Services

EMLP

-

AMTR
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EMLP

-

AMTR
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

EMLP

-

AMTR
0.0%

Financial Services

EMLP

-

AMTR
0.0%

Healthcare

EMLP

-

AMTR
0.0%

Real Estate

EMLP

-

AMTR
0.0%

Technology

EMLP

-

AMTR
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMLP vs. AMTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMLP
EMLP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

AMTR
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMLP vs. AMTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMLPAMTRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.42

EMLP vs. AMTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMLPAMTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

Drawdowns

EMLP vs. AMTR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMLPAMTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

Volatility

EMLP vs. AMTR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMLPAMTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

EMLP vs. AMTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMLP has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than AMTR's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMLP vs. AMTR - Dividend Comparison

EMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, while AMTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMTR
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
2.79%3.18%3.19%3.92%3.15%3.29%4.70%3.71%4.71%3.80%3.62%4.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMLP and AMTR have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMTR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMTR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.

EMLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.00% for AMTR.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for EMLP and 0.75% for AMTR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMLP and AMTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer