EMLO.L vs. XQUA.L
EMLO.L (UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and XQUA.L (Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - EMLO.L tracks the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD while XQUA.L tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMLO.L returned 3.09%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for XQUA.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMLO.L charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for XQUA.L.
Performance
EMLO.L vs. XQUA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMLO.L is traded in GBp, while XQUA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XQUA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMLO.L having a 1.29% return and XQUA.L slightly higher at 1.35%.
EMLO.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- 12.01%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.09%
- 10Y*
- —
XQUA.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 9.13%
- 3Y*
- 2.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 1.70%
EMLO.L vs. XQUA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLO.L UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.29% | 12.30% | 0.01% | 8.48% | -4.28% | -6.61% | -1.56% | 9.65% | 8.46% |
XQUA.L Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D | 1.35% | 2.93% | 1.34% | 2.14% | -7.98% | -0.52% | 3.82% | 5.83% | 3.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLO.L and XQUA.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018 | 0.51 |
The correlation between EMLO.L and XQUA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMLO.L vs. XQUA.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMLO.L
XQUA.L
EMLO.L vs. XQUA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (EMLO.L) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMLO.L | XQUA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.25 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 1.57 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.38 | 3.97 | +3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMLO.L | XQUA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 1.38 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.11 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.15 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
EMLO.L vs. XQUA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLO.L drawdown since its inception was -20.42%, roughly equal to the maximum XQUA.L drawdown of -20.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLO.L and XQUA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMLO.L | XQUA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.42% | -20.61% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.77% | -5.80% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.77% | -8.41% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.88% | -15.01% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -5.45% | +3.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -9.02% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 2.30% | -0.68% |
Volatility
EMLO.L vs. XQUA.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (EMLO.L) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D (XQUA.L) have volatilities of 1.98% and 1.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMLO.L | XQUA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.98% | 1.97% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.87% | 5.26% | -0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.81% | 6.58% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.65% | 9.10% | -1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.55% | 10.86% | -2.31% |
EMLO.L vs. XQUA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMLO.L has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XQUA.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMLO.L vs. XQUA.L - Dividend Comparison
EMLO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than XQUA.L's 4.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLO.L UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 5.51% | 5.66% | 5.13% | 4.54% | 4.40% | 4.95% | 4.94% | 5.12% |
XQUA.L Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF 1D | 4.61% | 4.49% | 4.61% | 4.24% | 6.92% | 4.08% | 4.54% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMLO.L and XQUA.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XQUA.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XQUA.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for EMLO.L.
EMLO.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while XQUA.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EMLO.L and 0.45% for XQUA.L.
Find the right allocation for EMLO.L and XQUA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer