PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMLO.L vs. JMBP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMLO.L vs. JMBP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (EMLO.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMLO.L is traded in GBp, while JMBP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JMBP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMLO.L achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than JMBP.L's 1.62% return.


EMLO.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.58%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.63%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*

JMBP.L

1D
0.24%
1M
1.00%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.99%
1Y
10.82%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMLO.L vs. JMBP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMLO.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.29%12.30%0.01%8.48%-4.28%-6.61%-1.56%3.03%
JMBP.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)
1.62%13.12%1.60%8.37%-17.57%-2.86%3.66%2.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EMLO.L and JMBP.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2019

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMLO.L vs. JMBP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMLO.L
EMLO.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EMLO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMLO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMLO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EMLO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMLO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

JMBP.L
JMBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMLO.L vs. JMBP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (EMLO.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMLO.LJMBP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.38

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.38

10.19

-2.81

EMLO.L vs. JMBP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMLO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMLO.L and JMBP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMLO.LJMBP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.99

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.09

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.11

+0.29

Drawdowns

EMLO.L vs. JMBP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMLO.L drawdown since its inception was -20.42%, smaller than the maximum JMBP.L drawdown of -27.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLO.L and JMBP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMLO.LJMBP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.42%

-27.19%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-4.52%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.77%

-7.61%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.88%

-26.88%

+15.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-0.08%

-2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-9.99%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.06%

+0.56%

Volatility

EMLO.L vs. JMBP.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (EMLO.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) have volatilities of 1.98% and 1.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMLO.LJMBP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

1.96%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.87%

4.53%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

5.44%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.65%

8.49%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.55%

10.58%

-2.03%

EMLO.L vs. JMBP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMLO.L has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than JMBP.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMLO.L vs. JMBP.L - Dividend Comparison

EMLO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, less than JMBP.L's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EMLO.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
5.51%5.66%5.13%4.54%4.40%4.95%4.94%5.12%
JMBP.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)
5.75%5.61%5.83%5.24%5.16%3.70%4.42%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMLO.L and JMBP.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JMBP.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JMBP.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for EMLO.L.

EMLO.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD, while JMBP.L tracks JP Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond (GBP Hedged). They also come from different issuers: UBS and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EMLO.L and 0.39% for JMBP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMLO.L and JMBP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer