PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMLO.L vs. VEMA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMLO.L vs. VEMA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (EMLO.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMLO.L vs. VEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMLO.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
-0.25%12.30%0.01%8.48%-4.28%-6.61%-1.56%7.89%
VEMA.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
-0.07%4.15%8.11%3.45%-5.29%-0.35%2.49%8.03%
Different Trading Currencies

EMLO.L is traded in GBp, while VEMA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VEMA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMLO.L achieves a -0.25% return, which is significantly lower than VEMA.L's -0.07% return.


EMLO.L

1D
0.56%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
-0.25%
6M
3.60%
1Y
10.43%
3Y*
5.82%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*

VEMA.L

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
2.92%
1Y
4.73%
3Y*
5.28%
5Y*
3.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMLO.L vs. VEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMLO.L has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VEMA.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMLO.L vs. VEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMLO.L
EMLO.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EMLO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMLO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMLO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EMLO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMLO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMA.L
VEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMLO.L vs. VEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (EMLO.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMLO.LVEMA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.90

0.65

+1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

0.92

+1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.12

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

1.17

+1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.89

2.70

+6.18

EMLO.L vs. VEMA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMLO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMLO.L and VEMA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMLO.LVEMA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

0.65

+1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.37

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.29

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between EMLO.L and VEMA.L is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EMLO.L vs. VEMA.L - Dividend Comparison

EMLO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, while VEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
EMLO.L
UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
5.60%5.66%5.13%4.54%4.40%4.95%4.94%5.12%
VEMA.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EMLO.L vs. VEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMLO.L drawdown since its inception was -20.42%, which is greater than VEMA.L's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLO.L and VEMA.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMLO.LVEMA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.42%

-14.59%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-4.57%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.88%

-11.41%

-0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-2.14%

-1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-6.38%

-2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.90%

-0.69%

Volatility

EMLO.L vs. VEMA.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan EM Multi-Factor Enhanced Local Currency Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (EMLO.L) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) at 1.90%. This indicates that EMLO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMLO.LVEMA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

1.90%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.20%

4.40%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.46%

7.28%

-1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.63%

8.20%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.57%

9.58%

-1.01%