PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMBP.L vs. JREG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMBP.L vs. JREG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JMBP.L is traded in GBP, while JREG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JREG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMBP.L achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than JREG.L's 9.88% return.


JMBP.L

1D
0.24%
1M
1.00%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.99%
1Y
10.82%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*

JREG.L

1D
0.14%
1M
4.54%
YTD
9.88%
6M
9.92%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMBP.L vs. JREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JMBP.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)
1.62%13.12%1.60%8.37%-17.57%-2.86%3.66%2.41%
JREG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
9.88%11.22%20.75%19.41%-7.92%25.50%13.77%1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between JMBP.L and JREG.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2019

0.40

The correlation between JMBP.L and JREG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMBP.L vs. JREG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMBP.L
JMBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

JREG.L
JREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMBP.L vs. JREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMBP.LJREG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

4.05

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

15.89

-5.70

JMBP.L vs. JREG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMBP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the JREG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMBP.L and JREG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMBP.LJREG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.28

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.92

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.86

-0.75

Drawdowns

JMBP.L vs. JREG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMBP.L drawdown since its inception was -27.19%, which is greater than JREG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMBP.L and JREG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMBP.LJREG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.19%

-25.88%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.52%

-6.51%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.61%

-18.75%

+11.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.88%

-18.75%

-8.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.18%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.99%

-3.17%

-6.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.66%

-0.60%

Volatility

JMBP.L vs. JREG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist) (JMBP.L) is 1.96%, while JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that JMBP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JREG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMBP.LJREG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

3.26%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.53%

8.75%

-4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.44%

11.57%

-6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.49%

14.39%

-5.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.58%

16.18%

-5.60%

JMBP.L vs. JREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMBP.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than JREG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMBP.L vs. JREG.L - Dividend Comparison

JMBP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, while JREG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
JMBP.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (dist)
5.75%5.61%5.83%5.24%5.16%3.70%4.42%
JREG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMBP.L and JREG.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JREG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JREG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JMBP.L.

JMBP.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while JREG.L is Global Equities. JMBP.L tracks JP Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond (GBP Hedged), while JREG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JMBP.L and 0.25% for JREG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMBP.L and JREG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer