EMKT vs. IXC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMKT (Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMKT is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Lazard, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. EMKT is actively managed, while IXC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. EMKT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXC.

Performance

EMKT vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMKT achieves a 30.02% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 32.22% return.

EMKT

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: 11.71%
• YTD: 30.02%
• 6M: 31.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IXC

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -1.75%
• YTD: 32.22%
• 6M: 30.00%
• 1Y: 48.10%
• 3Y*: 18.84%
• 5Y*: 19.64%
• 10Y*: 10.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMKT vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	30.02%	-1.29%
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF	32.22%	2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EMKT and IXC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	-0.15

Return for Risk

EMKT vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXC

IXC Risk / Return Rank: 76
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 68
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMKT vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMKT	IXC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.33	0.32	+2.01

Drawdowns

EMKT vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKT drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKT and IXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMKT	IXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.21%	-67.88%	+53.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.66%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-64.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-4.84%	+3.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.04%	-17.48%	+14.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMKT	IXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.42%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.46%	18.75%	+3.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.46%	23.50%	-1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.46%	26.85%	-4.39%

EMKT vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMKT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMKT vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

EMKT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF	2.79%	3.68%	4.56%	3.45%	4.76%	3.98%	4.86%	7.00%	3.51%	3.05%	2.86%	3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMKT and IXC in my portfolio?

EMKT and IXC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMKT or IXC?

On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMKT or IXC?

IXC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EMKT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMKT or IXC?

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.00% for EMKT.

What is the main difference between EMKT and IXC?

EMKT is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while IXC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EMKT and 0.46% for IXC.