EMKT vs. IBIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMKT (Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and IBIF (iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMKT is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Lazard, while IBIF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. EMKT is actively managed, while IBIF is passively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMKT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIF.

Performance

EMKT vs. IBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMKT achieves a 30.02% return, which is significantly higher than IBIF's 1.91% return.

EMKT

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: 11.71%
• YTD: 30.02%
• 6M: 31.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIF

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 4.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMKT vs. IBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	30.02%	-1.29%
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF	1.91%	-0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EMKT and IBIF is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

EMKT vs. IBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIF

IBIF Risk / Return Rank: 84
IBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
IBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
IBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMKT vs. IBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF (IBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMKT	IBIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.33	1.72	+0.61

Drawdowns

EMKT vs. IBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKT drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, which is greater than IBIF's maximum drawdown of -2.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKT and IBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMKT	IBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.21%	-2.50%	-11.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-0.11%	-1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.04%	-0.55%	-2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.29%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMKT	IBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.33%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.46%	2.03%	+20.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.46%	3.55%	+18.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.46%	3.55%	+18.91%

EMKT vs. IBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMKT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIF's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMKT vs. IBIF - Dividend Comparison

EMKT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBIF iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term TIPS ETF	3.74%	4.51%	4.05%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMKT and IBIF in my portfolio?

EMKT and IBIF have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMKT or IBIF?

On fees, IBIF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMKT or IBIF?

IBIF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EMKT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMKT or IBIF?

IBIF has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 0.00% for EMKT.

What is the main difference between EMKT and IBIF?

EMKT is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while IBIF is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EMKT and 0.10% for IBIF.