EMKT vs. DRLL
EMKT (Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMKT is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Lazard, while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. EMKT is actively managed, while DRLL is passively managed. Their -0.25 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EMKT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.
Performance
EMKT vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMKT achieves a 22.96% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 34.95% return.
EMKT
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- YTD
- 22.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DRLL
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 22.18%
- YTD
- 34.95%
- 1Y
- 42.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $486.14K | $506.54K | $559.53K | |
| $362.94K | $359.48K | $607.32K |
EMKT vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 22.96% | -1.26% |
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 34.95% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMKT and DRLL is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMKT vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank
EMKT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DRLL
EMKT vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMKT | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMKT vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMKT drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKT and DRLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMKT | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.21% | -23.73% | +9.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.46% | -5.52% | -1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -8.14% | +4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.67% | — |
Volatility
EMKT vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMKT | DRLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.76% | 22.98% | +2.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.76% | 23.79% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.76% | 23.79% | +1.97% |
EMKT vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMKT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMKT vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison
EMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than DRLL's 2.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF | 2.25% | 2.99% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 1.18% |
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMKT and DRLL have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EMKT.
DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 0.45% for EMKT.
EMKT is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DRLL is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EMKT and 0.41% for DRLL.
Find the right allocation for EMKT and DRLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer