PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMKIX vs. SEDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMKIX vs. SEDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMKIX achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than SEDAX's 4.06% return. Over the past 10 years, EMKIX has underperformed SEDAX with an annualized return of 0.56%, while SEDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.94% annualized return.


EMKIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.47%
6M
0.38%
YTD
1.79%
1Y
9.77%
3Y*
9.10%
5Y*
-0.89%
10Y*
0.56%
ALL TIME*
-0.79%

SEDAX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.40%
6M
1.43%
YTD
4.06%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
9.85%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
3.94%
ALL TIME*
3.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EMKIX vs. SEDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMKIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund
1.79%18.51%1.06%11.08%-22.93%-11.27%2.19%9.73%-5.31%10.29%
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
4.06%20.33%3.13%12.86%-14.53%-4.93%4.68%15.55%-8.11%15.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EMKIX and SEDAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2011

0.83

The correlation between EMKIX and SEDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMKIX vs. SEDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMKIX
EMKIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EMKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SEDAX
SEDAX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SEDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SEDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMKIX vs. SEDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMKIXSEDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.48

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

2.44

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.19

9.63

-2.44

EMKIX vs. SEDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMKIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the SEDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMKIX and SEDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMKIX vs. SEDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKIX drawdown since its inception was -47.14%, which is greater than SEDAX's maximum drawdown of -37.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKIX and SEDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMKIXSEDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.14%

-37.03%

-10.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.01%

-5.49%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.16%

-8.17%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.94%

-26.86%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

-27.25%

-12.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.49%

-0.92%

-17.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.04%

-6.74%

-14.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.39%

0.00%

Volatility

EMKIX vs. SEDAX - Volatility Comparison

Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX) at 1.17%. This indicates that EMKIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMKIXSEDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

1.17%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.34%

5.11%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.14%

5.80%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.57%

7.04%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.15%

8.38%

-0.23%

EMKIX vs. SEDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMKIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than SEDAX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMKIX vs. SEDAX - Dividend Comparison

EMKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, less than SEDAX's 8.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMKIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund
7.24%6.42%5.17%5.18%3.78%3.99%4.23%5.45%4.89%4.58%0.00%0.00%
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
8.61%7.30%7.24%4.65%2.08%4.69%1.52%3.75%3.17%4.70%3.59%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMKIX and SEDAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMKIX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to SEDAX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMKIX dropped -47.14% vs SEDAX's -37.03%.

SEDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMKIX and SEDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer