PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMKIX vs. ELBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMKIX vs. ELBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (ELBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMKIX achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly higher than ELBIX's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, EMKIX has underperformed ELBIX with an annualized return of 0.97%, while ELBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.49% annualized return.


EMKIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.56%
YTD
2.46%
6M
3.62%
1Y
12.54%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
-1.16%
10Y*
0.97%

ELBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.67%
1Y
8.19%
3Y*
6.28%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
2.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMKIX vs. ELBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMKIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund
2.46%18.51%1.06%11.08%-22.93%-11.27%2.19%9.73%-5.31%10.29%
ELBIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
0.24%19.17%-4.30%14.03%-10.00%-9.55%2.65%12.11%-7.02%13.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EMKIX and ELBIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2011

0.80

The correlation between EMKIX and ELBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMKIX vs. ELBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMKIX
EMKIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EMKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

ELBIX
ELBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ELBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ELBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ELBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ELBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ELBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMKIX vs. ELBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (ELBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMKIXELBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.24

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

1.19

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.54

3.61

+5.93

EMKIX vs. ELBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMKIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the ELBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMKIX and ELBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMKIX vs. ELBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKIX drawdown since its inception was -47.14%, which is greater than ELBIX's maximum drawdown of -42.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKIX and ELBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMKIXELBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.14%

-42.77%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.01%

-6.96%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.53%

-9.21%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.33%

-23.43%

-15.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

-26.97%

-13.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.95%

-17.25%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-25.47%

+4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

2.28%

-0.94%

Volatility

EMKIX vs. ELBIX - Volatility Comparison

Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (ELBIX) have volatilities of 1.57% and 1.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMKIXELBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

1.60%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.35%

5.78%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.23%

6.74%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.58%

7.70%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.19%

8.95%

-0.76%

EMKIX vs. ELBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMKIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ELBIX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMKIX vs. ELBIX - Dividend Comparison

EMKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, more than ELBIX's 6.68% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ELBIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund
6.68%8.01%4.10%4.23%1.39%0.00%1.20%0.65%2.54%1.96%
EMKIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund
7.29%6.42%5.17%5.18%3.78%3.99%4.23%5.45%4.89%4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMKIX and ELBIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ELBIX has higher volatility (1.60%) compared to EMKIX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMKIX dropped -47.14% vs ELBIX's -42.77%.

EMKIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMKIX and ELBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer