PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEDAX vs. GMOQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEDAX vs. GMOQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEDAX achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly lower than GMOQX's 9.53% return.


SEDAX

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.04%
YTD
4.48%
6M
5.09%
1Y
16.50%
3Y*
11.04%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
4.31%

GMOQX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.33%
YTD
9.53%
6M
9.72%
1Y
26.55%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEDAX vs. GMOQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
4.48%20.33%3.13%12.86%-14.53%-3.09%
GMOQX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI
9.53%22.45%12.60%17.76%-16.26%-2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SEDAX and GMOQX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2021

0.80

The correlation between SEDAX and GMOQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEDAX vs. GMOQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEDAX
SEDAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SEDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SEDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

GMOQX
GMOQX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GMOQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEDAX vs. GMOQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SEDAXGMOQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

2.21

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

6.93

-3.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.98

30.08

-18.10

SEDAX vs. GMOQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is lower than the GMOQX Sharpe Ratio of 4.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEDAX and GMOQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SEDAX vs. GMOQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEDAX drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than GMOQX's maximum drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEDAX and GMOQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEDAXGMOQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.03%

-31.41%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.49%

-3.82%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.44%

-9.02%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.20%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-9.61%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

0.88%

+0.49%

Volatility

SEDAX vs. GMOQX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund (SEDAX) has a higher volatility of 1.75% compared to GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX) at 1.17%. This indicates that SEDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEDAXGMOQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

1.17%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.13%

4.41%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.82%

5.34%

+0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.04%

10.83%

-3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.42%

10.83%

-2.41%

SEDAX vs. GMOQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEDAX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOQX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEDAX vs. GMOQX - Dividend Comparison

SEDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%, more than GMOQX's 5.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMOQX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI
5.82%6.37%6.23%10.36%13.87%7.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Emerging Markets Debt Fund
8.63%7.30%7.24%4.65%2.08%4.69%1.52%3.75%3.17%4.70%3.59%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEDAX and GMOQX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEDAX has higher volatility (1.75%) compared to GMOQX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEDAX dropped -37.03% vs GMOQX's -31.41%.

GMOQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.96 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEDAX and GMOQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer