ELBIX vs. EMFIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ELBIX (Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund) and EMFIX (Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund) are both mutual funds - ELBIX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Ashmore, while EMFIX is a Emerging Markets Equities fund managed by Ashmore. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ELBIX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for EMFIX.

Performance

ELBIX vs. EMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (ELBIX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ELBIX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

EMFIX

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: -5.13%
• 6M: 8.86%
• YTD: 19.78%
• 1Y: 43.14%
• 3Y*: 18.99%
• 5Y*: 6.23%
• 10Y*: 12.23%
• ALL TIME*: 5.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ELBIX vs. EMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ELBIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund	0.24%	19.17%	-4.30%	14.03%	-10.00%	-9.55%	2.65%	12.11%	-7.02%	13.54%
EMFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund	19.78%	35.16%	7.08%	9.68%	-26.09%	4.05%	30.00%	30.47%	-16.96%	46.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ELBIX and EMFIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2011	0.57

The correlation between ELBIX and EMFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ELBIX vs. EMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ELBIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EMFIX

EMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 75
EMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
EMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
EMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ELBIX vs. EMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (ELBIX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund (EMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ELBIX	EMFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.78	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.32	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.96	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.09	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ELBIX	EMFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-44.99%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.24%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.91%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.76%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-10.51%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-16.82%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ELBIX	EMFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.58%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	22.06%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	19.62%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	19.89%	—

ELBIX vs. EMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ELBIX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than EMFIX's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

ELBIX vs. EMFIX - Dividend Comparison

ELBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than EMFIX's 1.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ELBIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund	6.68%	8.01%	4.10%	4.23%	1.39%	0.00%	1.20%	0.65%	2.54%	1.96%	0.00%
EMFIX Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund	1.36%	1.65%	0.61%	1.25%	0.82%	22.32%	2.32%	2.16%	0.82%	2.12%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ELBIX and EMFIX in my portfolio?

ELBIX and EMFIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.