PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMKIX vs. GMOQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMKIX vs. GMOQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMKIX achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than GMOQX's 8.37% return.


EMKIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.11%
YTD
2.66%
6M
4.67%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
10.54%
5Y*
-1.34%
10Y*
1.03%

GMOQX

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.21%
YTD
8.37%
6M
9.29%
1Y
26.99%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMKIX vs. GMOQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EMKIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund
2.66%18.51%1.06%11.08%-22.93%-8.23%
GMOQX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI
8.37%22.45%12.60%17.76%-16.26%-2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EMKIX and GMOQX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2021

0.77

The correlation between EMKIX and GMOQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMKIX vs. GMOQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMKIX
EMKIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EMKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EMKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GMOQX
GMOQX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GMOQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMKIX vs. GMOQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMKIXGMOQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

5.05

-2.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.70

9.04

-5.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

2.25

-0.75

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

7.02

-4.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.87

30.53

-19.67

EMKIX vs. GMOQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMKIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the GMOQX Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMKIX and GMOQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMKIXGMOQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

5.05

-2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.73

-0.83

Drawdowns

EMKIX vs. GMOQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKIX drawdown since its inception was -47.14%, which is greater than GMOQX's maximum drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKIX and GMOQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMKIXGMOQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.14%

-31.41%

-15.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.01%

-3.82%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.53%

-9.02%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.79%

-0.04%

-17.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.07%

-9.72%

-11.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

0.88%

+0.45%

Volatility

EMKIX vs. GMOQX - Volatility Comparison

Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX) at 1.50%. This indicates that EMKIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMKIXGMOQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

1.50%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.23%

4.37%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.15%

5.34%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.56%

10.88%

-3.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.21%

10.88%

-2.67%

EMKIX vs. GMOQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMKIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOQX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMKIX vs. GMOQX - Dividend Comparison

EMKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, more than GMOQX's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMKIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund
7.26%6.42%5.17%5.18%3.78%3.99%4.23%5.45%4.89%4.58%
GMOQX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI
5.88%6.37%6.23%10.36%13.87%7.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMKIX and GMOQX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMKIX has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to GMOQX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMKIX dropped -47.14% vs GMOQX's -31.41%.

GMOQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMKIX and GMOQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer