PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMKIX vs. DLENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMKIX vs. DLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMKIX achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly higher than DLENX's 1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, EMKIX has underperformed DLENX with an annualized return of 1.03%, while DLENX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.61% annualized return.


EMKIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.11%
YTD
2.66%
6M
4.67%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
10.54%
5Y*
-1.34%
10Y*
1.03%

DLENX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.12%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.61%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
3.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMKIX vs. DLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMKIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund
2.66%18.51%1.06%11.08%-22.93%-11.27%2.19%9.73%-5.31%10.29%
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
1.16%8.11%7.92%9.36%-15.50%1.71%4.66%11.71%-3.54%8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EMKIX and DLENX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2011

0.60

The correlation between EMKIX and DLENX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMKIX vs. DLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMKIX
EMKIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EMKIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMKIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMKIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EMKIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMKIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DLENX
DLENX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
DLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMKIX vs. DLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMKIXDLENXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

3.26

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.70

4.86

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.76

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

3.45

-0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.87

13.77

-2.90

EMKIX vs. DLENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMKIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the DLENX Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMKIX and DLENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMKIXDLENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

3.26

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.41

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.78

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.95

-1.05

Drawdowns

EMKIX vs. DLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKIX drawdown since its inception was -47.14%, which is greater than DLENX's maximum drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKIX and DLENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMKIXDLENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.14%

-25.64%

-21.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.01%

-1.83%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.53%

-4.58%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.22%

-25.64%

-14.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

-25.64%

-14.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.79%

0.00%

-17.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.07%

-3.61%

-17.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

0.46%

+0.87%

Volatility

EMKIX vs. DLENX - Volatility Comparison

Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund (EMKIX) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N (DLENX) at 0.68%. This indicates that EMKIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMKIXDLENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

0.68%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.23%

1.43%

+3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.15%

1.93%

+4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.56%

4.55%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.21%

4.66%

+3.55%

EMKIX vs. DLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMKIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than DLENX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMKIX vs. DLENX - Dividend Comparison

EMKIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, more than DLENX's 5.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLENX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N
5.32%5.33%5.71%5.29%4.49%3.74%4.11%4.49%3.57%4.07%4.29%4.94%
EMKIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Total Return Fund
7.26%6.42%5.17%5.18%3.78%3.99%4.23%5.45%4.89%4.58%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMKIX and DLENX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMKIX has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to DLENX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMKIX dropped -47.14% vs DLENX's -25.64%.

DLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMKIX and DLENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer