EMIM.L vs. ZPRX.DE
EMIM.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and ZPRX.DE (SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMIM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while ZPRX.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMIM.L returned 11.13%/yr vs 9.80%/yr for ZPRX.DE. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMIM.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZPRX.DE.
Performance
EMIM.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMIM.L is traded in GBp, while ZPRX.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ZPRX.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMIM.L achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than ZPRX.DE's 6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, EMIM.L has outperformed ZPRX.DE with an annualized return of 11.13%, while ZPRX.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.80% annualized return.
EMIM.L
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- 3.05%
- YTD
- 22.83%
- 6M
- 25.36%
- 1Y
- 46.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
ZPRX.DE
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 20.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
EMIM.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 22.83% | 23.35% | 9.18% | 4.93% | -10.17% | 0.74% | 14.91% | 12.69% | -9.32% | 24.72% |
ZPRX.DE SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF | 6.94% | 33.41% | -0.25% | 12.96% | -8.78% | 18.59% | 1.93% | 22.28% | -18.05% | 17.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMIM.L and ZPRX.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015 | 0.57 |
The correlation between EMIM.L and ZPRX.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMIM.L vs. ZPRX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
EMIM.L
ZPRX.DE
EMIM.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMIM.L | ZPRX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.25 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | 1.54 | +2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.02 | 5.59 | +8.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMIM.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMIM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum ZPRX.DE drawdown of -39.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIM.L and ZPRX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMIM.L | ZPRX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -39.68% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -12.35% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | -14.77% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | -24.08% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.46% | -39.68% | +13.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -1.18% | -2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -6.57% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 3.40% | -0.20% |
Volatility
EMIM.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to SPDR MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRX.DE) at 4.00%. This indicates that EMIM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPRX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMIM.L | ZPRX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 4.00% | +3.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.94% | 11.39% | +3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.33% | 13.76% | +3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 16.56% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 17.30% | +0.56% |
EMIM.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMIM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPRX.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMIM.L vs. ZPRX.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMIM.L nor ZPRX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMIM.L and ZPRX.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMIM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMIM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZPRX.DE.
EMIM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while ZPRX.DE is Europe Equities. EMIM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while ZPRX.DE tracks MSCI Europe Small Cap Value Weighted. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EMIM.L and 0.30% for ZPRX.DE.
Find the right allocation for EMIM.L and ZPRX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer