EMIM.L vs. MSFT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EMIM.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EMIM.L returned 11.13%/yr vs 25.03%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EMIM.L vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

EMIM.L is traded in GBp, while MSFT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSFT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMIM.L achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, EMIM.L has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 11.13%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.03% annualized return.

EMIM.L

• 1D: 2.84%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 22.83%
• 6M: 25.36%
• 1Y: 44.91%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: 8.57%
• 10Y*: 11.13%

MSFT

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -2.51%
• YTD: -18.43%
• 6M: -18.19%
• 1Y: -16.45%
• 3Y*: 4.02%
• 5Y*: 10.70%
• 10Y*: 25.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMIM.L vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)	22.83%	23.35%	9.18%	4.93%	-10.17%	0.74%	14.91%	12.69%	-9.32%	24.72%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-18.43%	7.35%	14.90%	50.28%	-19.47%	53.92%	38.35%	51.56%	27.96%	28.56%

Correlation

The correlation between EMIM.L and MSFT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014	0.33

The correlation between EMIM.L and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EMIM.L vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMIM.L

EMIM.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EMIM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EMIM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
EMIM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EMIM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 17
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 14
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMIM.L vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMIM.L	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	-0.64	+3.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	-0.74	+4.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	0.90	+0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.09	-0.48	+4.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.02	-0.94	+14.96

EMIM.L vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMIM.L and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMIM.L vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMIM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -40.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIM.L and MSFT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMIM.L	MSFT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.70%	-40.05%	+8.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.92%	-34.18%	+23.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.56%	-34.18%	+18.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.98%	-34.18%	+12.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.46%	-34.18%	+7.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.48%	-28.53%	+25.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.70%	-8.84%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	17.53%	-14.33%

Volatility

EMIM.L vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) is 7.38%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that EMIM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMIM.L	MSFT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.38%	10.61%	-3.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.94%	21.91%	-6.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.33%	25.64%	-8.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.97%	25.92%	-9.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.86%	27.30%	-9.44%

Dividends

EMIM.L vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

EMIM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	0.91%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMIM.L and MSFT in my portfolio?

EMIM.L and MSFT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.