PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMIM.L vs. LUNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMIM.L vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMIM.L is traded in GBp, while LUNR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LUNR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMIM.L achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly lower than LUNR's 64.85% return.


EMIM.L

1D
2.84%
1M
1.78%
YTD
22.83%
6M
25.36%
1Y
44.91%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
11.13%

LUNR

1D
-13.04%
1M
-24.74%
YTD
64.85%
6M
121.84%
1Y
148.32%
3Y*
39.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMIM.L vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EMIM.L
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
22.83%23.35%9.18%4.93%-10.17%-3.82%
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
64.85%-16.99%623.18%-75.73%16.07%-0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between EMIM.L and LUNR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.14

The correlation between EMIM.L and LUNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMIM.L vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMIM.L
EMIM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMIM.L vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMIM.LLUNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.27

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

3.59

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

7.53

+6.48

EMIM.L vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMIM.L and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMIM.L vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMIM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIM.L and LUNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMIM.LLUNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-97.56%

+65.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-41.62%

+30.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-78.29%

+62.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

-70.83%

+67.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-64.78%

+56.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

19.77%

-16.57%

Volatility

EMIM.L vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) is 7.38%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 42.53%. This indicates that EMIM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMIM.LLUNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

42.53%

-35.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

92.39%

-77.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.33%

110.12%

-92.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

171.63%

-155.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

171.63%

-153.77%

Dividends

EMIM.L vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMIM.L nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EMIM.L and LUNR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMIM.L and LUNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer