PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMIM.L vs. JGRE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMIM.L vs. JGRE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JGRE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMIM.L achieves a 24.23% return, which is significantly higher than JGRE.L's 9.61% return.


EMIM.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
5.54%
YTD
24.23%
6M
26.48%
1Y
50.85%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
11.09%

JGRE.L

1D
0.12%
1M
4.66%
YTD
9.61%
6M
10.05%
1Y
26.28%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMIM.L vs. JGRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMIM.L
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
24.23%23.35%9.18%4.93%-10.17%0.74%14.91%12.69%2.01%
JGRE.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
9.61%11.65%20.63%18.59%-7.77%25.92%13.21%23.96%-6.01%

Correlation

The correlation between EMIM.L and JGRE.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.66

The correlation between EMIM.L and JGRE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMIM.L vs. JGRE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMIM.L
EMIM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

JGRE.L
JGRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JGRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMIM.L vs. JGRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JGRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMIM.LJGRE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.49

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

3.93

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.57

16.25

+0.32

EMIM.L vs. JGRE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is comparable to the JGRE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMIM.L and JGRE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMIM.LJGRE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04

2.59

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.01

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.92

-0.43

Drawdowns

EMIM.L vs. JGRE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMIM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, which is greater than JGRE.L's maximum drawdown of -25.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIM.L and JGRE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMIM.LJGRE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-25.31%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-6.65%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-18.49%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.98%

-18.49%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-0.17%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.71%

-3.10%

-5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

1.61%

+1.45%

Volatility

EMIM.L vs. JGRE.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JGRE.L) at 2.48%. This indicates that EMIM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JGRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMIM.LJGRE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.03%

2.48%

+4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.14%

7.20%

+6.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

10.12%

+6.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

13.16%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.81%

15.06%

+2.75%

EMIM.L vs. JGRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMIM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than JGRE.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EMIM.L vs. JGRE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMIM.L nor JGRE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EMIM.L and JGRE.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMIM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMIM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JGRE.L.

EMIM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while JGRE.L is Global Equities. EMIM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while JGRE.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EMIM.L and 0.25% for JGRE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMIM.L and JGRE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer