PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMIM.L vs. IUSN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMIM.L vs. IUSN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMIM.L is traded in GBp, while IUSN.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IUSN.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMIM.L achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than IUSN.DE's 14.82% return.


EMIM.L

1D
2.84%
1M
3.05%
YTD
22.83%
6M
25.36%
1Y
46.92%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
11.13%

IUSN.DE

1D
2.36%
1M
2.50%
YTD
14.82%
6M
14.36%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMIM.L vs. IUSN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMIM.L
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
22.83%23.35%9.18%4.93%-10.17%0.74%14.91%12.69%-6.40%
IUSN.DE
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
14.82%13.36%8.23%10.86%-9.04%16.45%11.18%22.45%-5.19%

Correlation

The correlation between EMIM.L and IUSN.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2018

0.60

The correlation between EMIM.L and IUSN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMIM.L vs. IUSN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMIM.L
EMIM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSN.DE
IUSN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IUSN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMIM.L vs. IUSN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMIM.LIUSN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.45

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

4.20

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

16.11

-2.09

EMIM.L vs. IUSN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the IUSN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMIM.L and IUSN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMIM.L vs. IUSN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMIM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum IUSN.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIM.L and IUSN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMIM.LIUSN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-33.60%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-7.95%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-22.57%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.98%

-22.57%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

0.00%

-3.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-6.48%

-2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

2.08%

+1.12%

Volatility

EMIM.L vs. IUSN.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE) at 3.98%. This indicates that EMIM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMIM.LIUSN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

3.98%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.94%

9.75%

+5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.33%

13.39%

+3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.97%

16.01%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

17.65%

+0.21%

EMIM.L vs. IUSN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMIM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IUSN.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMIM.L vs. IUSN.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMIM.L nor IUSN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EMIM.L and IUSN.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMIM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMIM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IUSN.DE.

EMIM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IUSN.DE is Global Equities. EMIM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while IUSN.DE tracks MSCI World Small Cap. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EMIM.L and 0.35% for IUSN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMIM.L and IUSN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer