EMIM.L vs. BRK-B
EMIM.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, EMIM.L returned 11.13%/yr vs 13.81%/yr for BRK-B. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EMIM.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMIM.L is traded in GBp, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMIM.L achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -2.17% return. Over the past 10 years, EMIM.L has underperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 11.13%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively higher 13.81% annualized return.
EMIM.L
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 22.83%
- 6M
- 25.36%
- 1Y
- 44.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- -2.17%
- 6M
- -2.30%
- 1Y
- 1.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.81%
EMIM.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIM.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 22.83% | 23.35% | 9.18% | 4.93% | -10.17% | 0.74% | 14.91% | 12.69% | -9.32% | 24.72% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -2.17% | 2.99% | 29.31% | 9.69% | 15.59% | 30.17% | -0.64% | 6.71% | 9.11% | 11.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMIM.L and BRK-B is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014 | 0.28 |
The correlation between EMIM.L and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMIM.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
EMIM.L
BRK-B
EMIM.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMIM.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.03 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.09 | 0.12 | +3.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.02 | 0.25 | +13.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMIM.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMIM.L drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -37.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIM.L and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMIM.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -37.92% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -11.88% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | -17.26% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | -20.84% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.46% | -21.44% | -5.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -11.90% | +8.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.70% | -7.40% | -1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 5.54% | -2.34% |
Volatility
EMIM.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 4.20%. This indicates that EMIM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMIM.L | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 4.20% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.94% | 12.04% | +2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.33% | 15.49% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 16.90% | -0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 19.86% | -2.00% |
Dividends
EMIM.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMIM.L nor BRK-B has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
EMIM.L and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EMIM.L and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer