PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMIF vs. TDEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMIF vs. TDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMIF achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than TDEC's 7.66% return.


EMIF

1D
-0.50%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
1.13%
6M
-0.46%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
11.63%
5Y*
4.64%
10Y*
2.41%

TDEC

1D
-2.13%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
7.66%
6M
8.74%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMIF vs. TDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EMIF
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF
1.13%33.90%-0.02%
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
7.66%21.39%-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EMIF and TDEC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024

0.54

The correlation between EMIF and TDEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMIF vs. TDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMIF
EMIF Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
EMIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIF Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIF Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

TDEC
TDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMIF vs. TDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMIFTDECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

2.51

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

10.81

-6.90

EMIF vs. TDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the TDEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMIF and TDEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMIF vs. TDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMIF drawdown since its inception was -48.02%, which is greater than TDEC's maximum drawdown of -10.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIF and TDEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMIFTDECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.02%

-10.30%

-37.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.57%

-8.16%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.97%

-2.13%

-10.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-1.05%

-14.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.24%

1.89%

+3.35%

Volatility

EMIF vs. TDEC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December (TDEC) at 4.52%. This indicates that EMIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMIFTDECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

4.52%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

9.98%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

10.71%

+5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.74%

12.03%

+7.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

12.03%

+8.55%

EMIF vs. TDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMIF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TDEC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMIF vs. TDEC - Dividend Comparison

EMIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, while TDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMIF
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF
4.18%4.96%4.12%2.64%3.08%3.94%2.54%2.07%2.64%2.58%3.16%2.07%
TDEC
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMIF and TDEC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMIF has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to TDEC (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMIF dropped -48.02% vs TDEC's -10.30%.

On 1-year performance, EMIF leads with 20.42% vs 20.35% for TDEC. On fees, EMIF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TDEC has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EMIF has performed better with a 20.42% return vs 20.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMIF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TDEC.

EMIF has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 0.00% for TDEC.

EMIF is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TDEC is Defined Outcome. EMIF tracks S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index, while TDEC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: iShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMIF and 0.95% for TDEC.

TDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMIF and TDEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer