EMIF vs. GEME
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) and Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME).
EMIF and GEME are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMIF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2009. GEME is an actively managed fund by Pacific AM. It was launched on Jan 22, 2025.
Performance
EMIF vs. GEME - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMIF vs. GEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 6.16% | 32.88% |
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 8.22% | 37.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMIF achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than GEME's 8.22% return.
EMIF
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 12.77%
- 1Y
- 39.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
GEME
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -10.02%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 6M
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- 44.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMIF vs. GEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EMIF and GEME have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Return for Risk
EMIF vs. GEME — Risk / Return Rank
EMIF
GEME
EMIF vs. GEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) and Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMIF | GEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 1.97 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.15 | 2.53 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.39 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 3.12 | +0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.68 | 12.31 | +1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMIF | GEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 1.97 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 1.79 | -1.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMIF and GEME is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EMIF vs. GEME - Dividend Comparison
EMIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than GEME's 6.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 4.67% | 4.96% | 4.12% | 2.64% | 3.08% | 3.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.64% | 2.58% | 3.16% | 2.07% |
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 6.48% | 7.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMIF vs. GEME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMIF drawdown since its inception was -48.02%, which is greater than GEME's maximum drawdown of -16.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIF and GEME.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMIF | GEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.02% | -16.86% | -31.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.49% | -14.21% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.65% | -10.68% | +2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.00% | -2.26% | -13.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.60% | -0.71% |
Volatility
EMIF vs. GEME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) is 7.64%, while Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that EMIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMIF | GEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 11.17% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 16.23% | -4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.67% | 22.67% | -6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.63% | 22.32% | -2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 22.32% | -1.71% |