EMIE.DE vs. HY3M.DE

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

EMIE.DE (UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) and HY3M.DE (VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - EMIE.DE tracks the JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets IG ESG Diversified Bond (EUR Hedged) while HY3M.DE tracks the ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMIE.DE returned -2.61%/yr vs 3.45%/yr for HY3M.DE. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. EMIE.DE charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HY3M.DE.

Performance

EMIE.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMIE.DE achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly lower than HY3M.DE's 6.76% return.

EMIE.DE

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -0.62%
• 6M: -0.79%
• YTD: -0.97%
• 1Y: 2.55%
• 3Y*: 2.29%
• 5Y*: -2.61%
• 10Y*: —

HY3M.DE

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.99%
• 6M: 4.21%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 1Y: 9.61%
• 3Y*: 9.20%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMIE.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EMIE.DE UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc	-0.97%	7.07%	-0.38%	3.90%	-19.73%	-2.89%	6.91%	2.50%
HY3M.DE VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF	6.76%	-3.30%	18.25%	4.13%	-7.66%	7.35%	-3.67%	2.87%

Correlation

The correlation between EMIE.DE and HY3M.DE is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019	-0.03

The correlation between EMIE.DE and HY3M.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EMIE.DE vs. HY3M.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMIE.DE

EMIE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 23
EMIE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
EMIE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
EMIE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 23
EMIE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
EMIE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 23

HY3M.DE

HY3M.DE Risk / Return Rank: 64
HY3M.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
HY3M.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
HY3M.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
HY3M.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
HY3M.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMIE.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMIE.DE	HY3M.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	1.44	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	2.16	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.26	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	3.11	-2.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.07	9.17	-7.10

EMIE.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMIE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the HY3M.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMIE.DE and HY3M.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMIE.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMIE.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.00%, which is greater than HY3M.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMIE.DE and HY3M.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMIE.DE	HY3M.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.00%	-21.08%	-5.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.48%	-3.08%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.03%	-12.09%	+5.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.87%	-13.58%	-12.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.45%	-0.77%	-13.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.67%	-7.04%	-5.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.23%	1.04%	+0.19%

Volatility

EMIE.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM IG ESG Diversified Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EMIE.DE) is 0.66%, while VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE) has a volatility of 1.80%. This indicates that EMIE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HY3M.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMIE.DE	HY3M.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.66%	1.80%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.85%	5.09%	-2.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.68%	6.74%	-3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.68%	8.60%	-1.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.98%	13.19%	-5.21%

EMIE.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMIE.DE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than HY3M.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMIE.DE vs. HY3M.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMIE.DE nor HY3M.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMIE.DE and HY3M.DE in my portfolio?

EMIE.DE and HY3M.DE have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EMIE.DE or HY3M.DE?

On fees, HY3M.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMIE.DE or HY3M.DE?

HY3M.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for EMIE.DE.

What is the main difference between EMIE.DE and HY3M.DE?

EMIE.DE tracks JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets IG ESG Diversified Bond (EUR Hedged), while HY3M.DE tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for EMIE.DE and 0.40% for HY3M.DE.