PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HY3M.DE vs. JMBA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HY3M.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE) and JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HY3M.DE achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly higher than JMBA.DE's 4.33% return.


HY3M.DE

1D
-0.75%
1M
0.99%
6M
4.72%
YTD
6.33%
1Y
9.36%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*

JMBA.DE

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.55%
6M
3.60%
YTD
4.33%
1Y
10.91%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HY3M.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HY3M.DE
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
6.33%-3.30%18.25%4.13%-7.66%7.35%-3.67%1.59%
JMBA.DE
JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF
4.33%0.84%7.77%5.79%-10.80%5.58%-4.14%-7.72%

Correlation

The correlation between HY3M.DE and JMBA.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.53

The correlation between HY3M.DE and JMBA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HY3M.DE vs. JMBA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HY3M.DE
HY3M.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HY3M.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HY3M.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

JMBA.DE
JMBA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
JMBA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMBA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HY3M.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE) and JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HY3M.DEJMBA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

3.84

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

11.71

-1.70

HY3M.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HY3M.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the JMBA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HY3M.DE and JMBA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HY3M.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HY3M.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.08%, smaller than the maximum JMBA.DE drawdown of -26.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HY3M.DE and JMBA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HY3M.DEJMBA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.08%

-26.66%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-3.14%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.09%

-12.45%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.58%

-14.09%

+0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-1.40%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.04%

-11.27%

+4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

1.03%

+0.02%

Volatility

HY3M.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HY3M.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to JPM USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF (JMBA.DE) at 1.53%. This indicates that HY3M.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMBA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HY3M.DEJMBA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

1.53%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.14%

4.11%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.85%

6.05%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.61%

8.43%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.20%

10.70%

+2.50%

HY3M.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HY3M.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than JMBA.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

HY3M.DE vs. JMBA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither HY3M.DE nor JMBA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HY3M.DE and JMBA.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JMBA.DE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JMBA.DE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HY3M.DE.

HY3M.DE tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while JMBA.DE tracks J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Risk-Aware Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HY3M.DE and 0.39% for JMBA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HY3M.DE and JMBA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer