EMHC vs. XLE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMHC (SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMHC is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging USD Bond Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMHC returned 1.55%/yr vs 20.44%/yr for XLE. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMHC charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.

Performance

EMHC vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMHC achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 32.17% return.

EMHC

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 1.57%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 11.54%
• 3Y*: 8.74%
• 5Y*: 1.55%
• 10Y*: —

XLE

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -1.14%
• YTD: 32.17%
• 6M: 29.80%
• 1Y: 45.00%
• 3Y*: 17.46%
• 5Y*: 20.44%
• 10Y*: 10.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMHC vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF	1.57%	14.07%	3.52%	10.06%	-17.75%	1.68%
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	32.17%	7.88%	5.56%	-0.63%	64.32%	16.95%

Correlation

The correlation between EMHC and XLE is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021	0.10

The correlation between EMHC and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMHC vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMHC	XLE
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EMHC vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMHC

EMHC Risk / Return Rank: 64
EMHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
EMHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
EMHC Omega Ratio Rank: 68
EMHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
EMHC Martin Ratio Rank: 62

XLE

XLE Risk / Return Rank: 63
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMHC vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMHC	XLE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.21	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	2.84	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.35	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	3.75	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.09	10.92	+0.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMHC vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMHC Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMHC and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMHC	XLE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	2.21	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.79	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.31	-0.09

Drawdowns

EMHC vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMHC drawdown since its inception was -28.03%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHC and XLE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMHC	XLE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.03%	-71.26%	+43.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.37%	-12.05%	+7.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.67%	-20.14%	+12.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.03%	-26.04%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-6.15%	+5.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.91%	-17.98%	+8.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	4.14%	-3.10%

Volatility

EMHC vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) is 1.89%, while State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that EMHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMHC	XLE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.89%	8.25%	-6.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.16%	16.58%	-12.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.43%	20.53%	-15.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.06%	26.02%	-16.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.96%	29.59%	-20.63%

EMHC vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMHC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EMHC vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

EMHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than XLE's 2.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF	6.11%	6.16%	5.95%	5.12%	5.11%	2.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.54%	3.28%	3.36%	3.55%	3.68%	4.21%	5.62%	6.72%	3.54%	3.03%	2.26%	3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMHC and XLE in my portfolio?

EMHC and XLE have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMHC or XLE?

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to EMHC (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMHC dropped -28.03% vs XLE's -71.26%.

Which ETF is better, EMHC or XLE?

On 5-year performance, XLE leads with 20.44% vs 1.55% for EMHC. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EMHC has been the lower-risk option at 1.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMHC or XLE?

Over the 5-year period, XLE has performed better with a 20.44% return vs 1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMHC or XLE?

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for EMHC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMHC or XLE?

EMHC has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 2.54% for XLE.

What is the main difference between EMHC and XLE?

EMHC is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while XLE is Energy Equities. EMHC tracks Bloomberg Emerging USD Bond Core Index - Benchmark TR Net, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for EMHC and 0.08% for XLE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.