EMHC vs. BIL
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL).
EMHC and BIL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMHC is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Emerging USD Bond Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Apr 6, 2021. BIL is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 1-3 Month Treasury Bill Index. It was launched on May 25, 2007. Both EMHC and BIL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EMHC vs. BIL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMHC vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | -1.69% | 14.07% | 3.52% | 10.06% | -17.75% | 1.68% |
BIL SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.85% | 4.15% | 5.19% | 4.94% | 1.40% | -0.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMHC achieves a -1.69% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 0.85% return.
EMHC
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -3.43%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 9.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- 2.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMHC vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMHC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EMHC vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank
EMHC
BIL
EMHC vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMHC | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 19.52 | -18.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.01 | 254.04 | -252.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 180.28 | -178.99 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 365.54 | -363.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.84 | 4,104.04 | -4,095.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMHC | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 19.52 | -18.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 12.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 8.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 2.72 | -2.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMHC and BIL is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EMHC vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison
EMHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.33%, more than BIL's 4.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMHC SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF | 6.33% | 6.16% | 5.95% | 5.12% | 5.11% | 2.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BIL SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 4.01% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
EMHC vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMHC drawdown since its inception was -28.03%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMHC and BIL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMHC | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.03% | -0.78% | -27.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.37% | -0.01% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.44% | 0.00% | -3.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -0.26% | -9.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 0.00% | +1.08% |
Volatility
EMHC vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (EMHC) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that EMHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMHC | BIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 0.05% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.85% | 0.14% | +3.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.76% | 0.21% | +6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.05% | 0.26% | +8.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.05% | 0.26% | +8.79% |