EMGU.L vs. IUIT.L
EMGU.L (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF) and IUIT.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMGU.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, while IUIT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMGU.L returned 8.74%/yr vs 26.05%/yr for IUIT.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMGU.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIT.L.
Performance
EMGU.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMGU.L is traded in GBP, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMGU.L achieves a 24.44% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 26.17% return.
EMGU.L
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 24.44%
- 6M
- 26.29%
- 1Y
- 50.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.74%
- 10Y*
- —
IUIT.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 16.60%
- YTD
- 26.17%
- 6M
- 24.49%
- 1Y
- 56.60%
- 3Y*
- 31.96%
- 5Y*
- 26.05%
- 10Y*
- 27.54%
EMGU.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGU.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF | 24.44% | 22.98% | 9.19% | 4.92% | -10.05% | 0.64% | 14.80% | 3.98% |
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 23.54% | 14.17% | 40.92% | 51.48% | -20.73% | 35.36% | 38.94% | 2.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMGU.L and IUIT.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between EMGU.L and IUIT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (5 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EMGU.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMGU.L
IUIT.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
EMGU.L
IUIT.L
Financial Services
EMGU.L
IUIT.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMGU.L
IUIT.L
-
Industrials
EMGU.L
IUIT.L
Basic Materials
EMGU.L
IUIT.L
-
Communication Services
EMGU.L
IUIT.L
-
Energy
EMGU.L
IUIT.L
Healthcare
EMGU.L
IUIT.L
-
Consumer Defensive
EMGU.L
IUIT.L
-
Utilities
EMGU.L
IUIT.L
-
Real Estate
EMGU.L
IUIT.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMGU.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMGU.L
IUIT.L
EMGU.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (EMGU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMGU.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.46 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 3.32 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.46 | 8.42 | +8.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMGU.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 2.78 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 1.14 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 1.24 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
EMGU.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMGU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.97%, smaller than the maximum IUIT.L drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGU.L and IUIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMGU.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.97% | -28.01% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.86% | -16.96% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.41% | -28.01% | +12.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.05% | -28.01% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -0.78% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.03% | -5.29% | -3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 6.70% | -3.62% |
Volatility
EMGU.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (EMGU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) have volatilities of 7.12% and 7.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMGU.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 7.16% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.90% | 15.20% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.30% | 20.23% | -3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 22.82% | -7.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 22.51% | -4.93% |
EMGU.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMGU.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMGU.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison
EMGU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while IUIT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGU.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF | 1.61% | 1.93% | 2.26% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 1.86% | 1.81% |
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMGU.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EMGU.L.
EMGU.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. EMGU.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EMGU.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.
Find the right allocation for EMGU.L and IUIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer