EMGU.L vs. AIA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (EMGU.L) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA).
EMGU.L and AIA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMGU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Mar 5, 2018. AIA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Asia 50. It was launched on Nov 13, 2007. Both EMGU.L and AIA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EMGU.L vs. AIA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMGU.L vs. AIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGU.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF | 5.52% | 22.98% | 9.19% | 4.92% | -10.05% | 0.64% | 14.80% | 3.98% |
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 11.96% | 37.26% | 22.36% | -0.89% | -15.06% | -10.07% | 29.80% | 4.76% |
Different Trading Currencies
EMGU.L is traded in GBP, while AIA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AIA values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMGU.L achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly lower than AIA's 11.96% return.
EMGU.L
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 9.52%
- 1Y
- 29.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- —
AIA
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 47.82%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMGU.L vs. AIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMGU.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AIA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMGU.L vs. AIA — Risk / Return Rank
EMGU.L
AIA
EMGU.L vs. AIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (EMGU.L) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMGU.L | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 1.93 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 2.55 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 3.10 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.89 | 11.36 | -1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMGU.L | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.93 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.27 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.38 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMGU.L and AIA is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMGU.L vs. AIA - Dividend Comparison
EMGU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than AIA's 2.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMGU.L iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF | 1.90% | 1.93% | 2.26% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 1.86% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 2.27% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.07% | 2.59% | 1.54% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.49% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% |
Drawdowns
EMGU.L vs. AIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMGU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.97%, smaller than the maximum AIA drawdown of -46.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGU.L and AIA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMGU.L | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.97% | -60.89% | +34.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.86% | -16.52% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.05% | -51.12% | +29.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.57% | -9.68% | +2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.22% | -16.81% | +7.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 4.28% | -1.21% |
Volatility
EMGU.L vs. AIA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (EMGU.L) is 6.86%, while iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that EMGU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMGU.L | AIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.86% | 10.03% | -3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.09% | 18.28% | -6.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.08% | 24.95% | -8.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 22.75% | -7.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 22.15% | -4.76% |