EMF vs. FHKFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX).
EMF is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 27, 1987. FHKFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 29, 2018.
Performance
EMF vs. FHKFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMF vs. FHKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund | 6.77% | 58.20% | 6.56% | 8.84% | -21.53% | -8.23% | 24.48% | 27.20% | -5.89% |
FHKFX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund | 4.00% | 38.51% | 5.42% | 12.10% | -24.50% | -4.15% | 17.85% | 9.64% | -8.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMF achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly higher than FHKFX's 4.00% return.
EMF
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -10.43%
- YTD
- 6.77%
- 6M
- 15.15%
- 1Y
- 53.85%
- 3Y*
- 24.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.80%
FHKFX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -11.59%
- YTD
- 4.00%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 36.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMF vs. FHKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMF has a 1.43% expense ratio, which is higher than FHKFX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMF vs. FHKFX — Risk / Return Rank
EMF
FHKFX
EMF vs. FHKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMF | FHKFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 1.88 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | 2.44 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.36 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 2.68 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.49 | 10.08 | +1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMF | FHKFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 1.88 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.20 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.26 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMF and FHKFX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMF vs. FHKFX - Dividend Comparison
EMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, more than FHKFX's 2.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMF Templeton Emerging Markets Fund | 9.22% | 9.73% | 4.28% | 6.22% | 9.89% | 6.92% | 3.51% | 7.36% | 5.92% | 12.11% | 1.62% | 12.81% |
FHKFX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund | 2.29% | 2.38% | 2.86% | 2.43% | 2.56% | 3.46% | 1.38% | 2.28% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMF vs. FHKFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMF drawdown since its inception was -76.97%, which is greater than FHKFX's maximum drawdown of -45.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMF and FHKFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMF | FHKFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.97% | -45.47% | -31.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.48% | -12.54% | -6.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.87% | -42.10% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.45% | -12.54% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.12% | -17.58% | -11.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 3.33% | +1.41% |
Volatility
EMF vs. FHKFX - Volatility Comparison
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF) has a higher volatility of 11.00% compared to Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) at 9.56%. This indicates that EMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMF | FHKFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.00% | 9.56% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.42% | 14.63% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.24% | 19.29% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 18.69% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 19.54% | +0.76% |