EMES.L vs. SEMB.L
EMES.L (iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF) and SEMB.L (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds from iShares tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMES.L returned 1.35%/yr vs 3.55%/yr for SEMB.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
EMES.L vs. SEMB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EMES.L is traded in USD, while SEMB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SEMB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMES.L achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than SEMB.L's 2.49% return.
EMES.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 10.68%
- 3Y*
- 9.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- —
SEMB.L
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 13.65%
- 3Y*
- 11.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.88%
EMES.L vs. SEMB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMES.L iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF | 1.50% | 13.10% | 5.45% | 9.57% | -18.82% | -2.59% | 5.41% | 15.66% | -0.48% |
SEMB.L iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.49% | 16.21% | 7.37% | 11.62% | -17.42% | -0.50% | 6.28% | 18.39% | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMES.L and SEMB.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between EMES.L and SEMB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMES.L vs. SEMB.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMES.L
SEMB.L
EMES.L vs. SEMB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EMES.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMES.L | SEMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.40 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 3.04 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.84 | 13.13 | -3.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMES.L | SEMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.23 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.38 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.67 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
EMES.L vs. SEMB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMES.L drawdown since its inception was -28.84%, smaller than the maximum SEMB.L drawdown of -31.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMES.L and SEMB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMES.L | SEMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.84% | -31.45% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.48% | -4.48% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.22% | -7.17% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.84% | -27.45% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -0.05% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -4.25% | -3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 1.04% | +0.04% |
Volatility
EMES.L vs. SEMB.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (EMES.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SEMB.L) have volatilities of 2.26% and 2.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMES.L | SEMB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.26% | 2.20% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.55% | 4.84% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.47% | 6.11% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.28% | 9.42% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.24% | 10.07% | -0.83% |
EMES.L vs. SEMB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EMES.L and SEMB.L have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
EMES.L vs. SEMB.L - Dividend Comparison
EMES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, less than SEMB.L's 7.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMES.L iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF | 5.78% | 5.78% | 5.45% | 5.41% | 5.03% | 3.48% | 3.49% | 4.60% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEMB.L iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) | 7.83% | 7.87% | 7.27% | 7.21% | 6.70% | 5.35% | 5.28% | 6.25% | 6.15% | 6.48% | 6.88% | 7.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMES.L and SEMB.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMES.L and SEMB.L have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.
Both ETFs track JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD.
Find the right allocation for EMES.L and SEMB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer