PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMEQ vs. STNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMEQ vs. STNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMEQ achieves a 70.04% return, which is significantly higher than STNG's 57.90% return.


EMEQ

1D
0.10%
1M
0.76%
6M
58.06%
YTD
70.04%
1Y
127.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

STNG

1D
4.03%
1M
4.14%
6M
46.43%
YTD
57.90%
1Y
79.55%
3Y*
24.33%
5Y*
34.53%
10Y*
8.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMEQ vs. STNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
70.04%69.78%-0.73%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
57.90%6.03%-26.91%

Correlation

The correlation between EMEQ and STNG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMEQ vs. STNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEQ
EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

STNG
STNG Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
STNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
STNG Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
STNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
STNG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMEQ vs. STNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) and Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMEQSTNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.34

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.98

3.49

+3.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.27

8.91

+14.37

EMEQ vs. STNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMEQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is higher than the STNG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMEQ and STNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMEQ vs. STNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMEQ drawdown since its inception was -19.99%, smaller than the maximum STNG drawdown of -91.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMEQ and STNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMEQSTNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.99%

-91.13%

+71.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.91%

-22.74%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.48%

-8.12%

-4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-49.15%

+44.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

8.90%

-3.54%

Volatility

EMEQ vs. STNG - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a higher volatility of 18.22% compared to Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) at 12.53%. This indicates that EMEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMEQSTNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.22%

12.53%

+5.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.48%

28.31%

+7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.20%

38.59%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.24%

45.01%

-11.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.24%

54.21%

-20.97%

Dividends

EMEQ vs. STNG - Dividend Comparison

EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than STNG's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMEQ
Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.62%2.76%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
2.17%3.19%3.22%1.73%0.74%3.12%3.57%1.02%2.27%1.31%11.04%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMEQ and STNG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMEQ has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to STNG (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMEQ dropped -19.99% vs STNG's -91.13%.

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMEQ and STNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer